Louisiana Private Investigator Licensing Practice Exam

What is a possibility when two PIs are present during a surveillance according to the Larocca Rule?

1. Increased risk of getting caught

2. Corroboration of testimony

3. Reduction of evidence quality

4. Higher cost of investigation

The correct answer is: Corroboration of testimony

The correct choice highlights the benefit of having two private investigators (PIs) present during a surveillance operation in terms of corroboration of testimony. The Larocca Rule suggests that when two PIs are involved, they can independently observe the same event, which allows for detailed cross-verification. This reinforces the reliability of their statements and findings because each investigator can support the other’s observations. When a situation arises in which the accuracy of a report would be questioned, having two witnesses who can confirm each other's accounts adds significant weight to the documentation and can enhance the overall quality of the investigation. The other options present potential considerations when conducting surveillance, but they do not reflect the primary advantage of dual PI involvement as outlined by the Larocca Rule. For instance, while the presence of two PIs might intuitively seem to increase the risk of detection, this isn't a direct consequence of the rule itself. Similarly, concerns about evidence quality or investigation costs are valid but do not pertain to the specific benefits of corroboration that arise from coordinated efforts in observation.